Sensor sizes explained: what you need to know
It used to be the case that if you bought a compact camera you’d have a small sensor, and if you went for an interchangeable-lens camera like a DSLR you got a much larger one. This would also typically be reflected in the quality of the images from those cameras, with larger sensors often producing high-quality results than smaller ones.
To some extent this is still the case. Sensors are typically the most expensive part of a camera to manufacture, and the larger you go the pricier the camera gets. For this reason you won't find expensive models toting 1/2.3-inch sensors, just as you wouldn't find cheap, basic compact cameras with full-frame ones.
Sensors are typically the most expensive part of a camera to manufacture, and the larger you go the pricier the camera gets
However, as manufacturers started offering compact cameras with relatively large sensors, and interchangeable-lens cameras with smaller ones, the situation become more complex. Today, we find some small sensors work very well in a range of conditions, for example, while some larger ones may present a handful of benefits over smaller ones in one way, but fall down in another.
Sensor technology has advanced rapidly over the past few years, and the breadth of options across all kinds of cameras is likely to confuse many users, particularly first-time buyers who may not be sure what to expect from different kinds of sensors. Furthermore, as the size of sensor has a bearing on the effective focal length of your lens, this becomes yet another thing to consider when choosing a new camera.
Here, we list the different types of sensor sizes used in cameras today, in ascending order of size, and how each affects image quality. But before we do that, we need to briefly talk about the relationship between sensor size and focal length.
Sensor size and focal length
The size of the sensor inside a camera has a direct effect on what kind of lenses can be used with that camera. If you buy a compact camera the lens is built into the body, so there's less to think about here from a buying perspective, but with interchangeable-lens cameras, any lens used needs to be able to have an image circle – the diameter of the light that exits the lens – that can sufficiently cover the dimensions of the sensor. One exception to this will be discussed later on.
Whether they're built into the body of a camera or supplied separately, lenses are marked with their actual focal length, rather than the effective focal length when used on a particular camera. The problem here is that different lenses marked with two completely different focal lengths may provide the same effective focal range to work with, as they're designed to be used with different sensors. For this reason, manufacturers often provide an ‘equivalent’ focal length, which uses the full-frame sensor as its reference point, to make things easier to understand.
Here’s an example of this. A camera with a sensor that’s smaller than full-frame may be used with a lens that has a focal length of 18-55mm, but in reality the effective focal range you’ll end up with is closer to 27-82mm. This is because the sensor is not large enough to take advantage of the lens to the same extent as a full-frame sensor can. By discarding some of the peripheral areas of the lens, it ends up appearing as though you’re using a longer focal length.
Similarly, a compact camera may have a 19mm lens built into it, but if the size of sensor is smaller than full-frame, it will only ever be able to offer a longer effective focal length on that body, perhaps 28mm or so. This figure is determined by the ‘crop factor’ – that is, the number by which you need to multiply the focal length to work out the effective focal length of the combination. This will be examined in greater detail for some of the sensor sizes below.
Sensor sizes
Here, we take a closer look at the main sizes of sensor used in today’s cameras.
Note: not all sensors within the same category have exactly the same dimensions. The measurements provided are an example of one such sensor within that format.
1/2.3-inch
Dimensions: approx. 6.3 x 4.7mm
This is the smallest sensor that's commonly used in cameras today, and is typically found in budget compacts. They usually offer between 16-20MP.
These used to be common across these types of cameras, but the gradual shift in focus by manufacturers towards enthusiast cameras with larger sensors means they aren't as common in new cameras.
Their size allows manufacturers to make very compact cameras with long lenses, such as superzoom compacts. A larger sensor used in such cameras would necessitate a larger, heavier and more expensive lens.
For general snapshots taken in good lighting conditions, cameras using these sensors may deliver perfectly acceptable results, but otherwise they can struggle to hold on to highlight detail and may produce images with a grainy, noisy texture.
1/1.7-inch
Dimensions: approx. 7.6 x 5.7mm
Slightly larger than the 1/2.3-inch types above, these sensors make it a little easier to separate a subject from its background, and typically offer better performance with regards to holding onto detail in shadow and highlights; they're also likely to perform better in low light.
These were once the default choice for enthusiast compact cameras, but their popularity has waned in the face of larger and more advanced 1-inch sensors (discussed below). This is also the sensor size used by Pentax in some of its recent Q-series compact system cameras.
1-inch
Dimensions: approx. 13.2mm x 8.8mm
This sensor is currently a popular choice across a range of cameras, with its size making it a versatile option.
It’s most commonly used in pocket-friendly enthusiast compact cameras, and lenses here will typically be limited to around 24-70mm or 24-100mm (in 35mm equivalent terms). It has, however, also now featured in a handful of superzoom cameras such as Panasonic’s FZ2000 and Sony’s RX10 III.
A 1-inch sensor also been employed in Nikon’s 1 series of compact system cameras, and has even found its way into a smartphone, the Panasonic CM1.
Cameras that use these sensors can typically provide very good quality images, particularly as many of the compact cameras that use them have wide maximum apertures that let in plenty of light, which helps to deliver cleaner images.
This enhanced image quality is partly the result of the technology on which these sensors as based, rather than simply their size. Recent versions may be built with an unconventional construction, for example, which enables them to capture light more effectively than standard sensors.
Micro Four Thirds
Dimensions: approx. 17.3 x 13mm
The format used by Olympus and Panasonic compact system cameras, these are a fair bit larger than the 1-inch sensors described on the previous page, but still smaller than APS-C types described below.
As this type of sensor has a surface area that’s around a quarter of the size of full-frame sensors, calculating the effective focal length of compatible lenses is easy: you just double it.
So, a 17mm lens used on such a camera will provide an effective focal length similar to a 34mm lens on a full-frame body. Similarly, a 12-35mm lens provides a focal range equivalent to 24-70mm lens on the same camera.
A 12.8MP version of this sensor was also used by Panasonic’s in its Lumix LX100 compact camera. Here this was paired with a lens that gave a focal length equivalent to 24-75mm on a full-frame camera.
APS-C
Dimensions: approx. 23.5mm x 15.6mm
Long used in entry-level and mid-range DSLRs, and now in many compact system cameras too, this type of sensor provides a good balance between system portability, image quality, and flexibility with regards to lenses.
Not all APS-C sensors are equal in size however: Canon’s APS-C sensors are a touch smaller than those inside Nikon and Sony models, with a crop factor of 1.6x rather than 1.5x. Either way, these are a good all-round option, and cameras that use them are often preferred over full-frame models by some nature and sports photographers, as the crop factor enables them to get closer to their subjects with a given lens.
APS-C sensors have also been employed in a number of compact cameras, such as Ricoh’s GR II, Fujifilm’s X100F and the Sigma DP2 Quattro. Here, in order to keep image quality high and the camera portable, they're paired with fixed focal length lenses.
The Ricoh GR II, for example, has a 19mm lens, while the Fujifilm X100F has a 23mm lens and the Sigma DP2 Quattro a 30mm lens, and these provide focal lengths equivalent to 28mm, 35mm and 45mm respectively. These lenses also have fairly wide maximum apertures, which allows the user to more easily capture a shallow depth of field.
APS-H
Dimensions: approx. 26.6 x 17.9mm
This type of sensor was commonly associated with Canon’s older EOS-1D models, such as the EOS-1D Mark III and EOS 1D Mark IV, although the company appears to have moved away from the format, adopting full-frame alternatives for its entire current EOS-1D DSLR series.
Being smaller than full-frame but larger than APS-C sensors, the crop factor of these is accordingly between the two at 1.3x. So, a 24mm lens used with such a sensor would provide an effective focal length closer to 31mm.
More recently, a 51MP version of this type of sensor was employed in Sigma’s sd Quattro H model. Canon also announced that it was developing a 250MP APS-H sensor back in 2015, although it stated that the likely applications for this would be for surveillance, crime prevention tools and industrial equipment among other things, rather than for commercially available DSLRs.
Full-frame
Dimensions: approx 36 x 24mm
Full-frame sensors are used in many enthusiast and professional cameras, including the flagship models in many manufacturers’ lines. Their relatively large surface area allows them to collect plenty of light, which in turn helps to produce high-quality images, while the larger area gives the manufacturer more space to play with when it comes to deciding on the number of pixels. Currently, some have as few as 12MP, while others have 24MP, 36MP and even 50MP.
Full-frame sensors are (roughly) the same size as a 35mm film negative, so there's no crop factor to think about here. If you use a lens designed for a 35mm film camera on a digital body with a full-frame sensor, the effective focal length will be the same.
Depending on the system and manufacturer, some lenses designed for APS-C cameras can be used on full-frame bodies at a reduced resolution (the camera essentially crops away the edges of the frame so that you don't get any darkening of the corners). However, you should always check that your camera supports this, as using incompatible lenses can damage the mirror.
Medium-format
Dimensions: approx 44mm x 33mm
Medium-format sensors are significantly larger than full-frame types, and the arrival of a number of recent cameras using them has sparked a huge amount of interest in the format. These include the Fujifilm GFX 50S and Hasselblad X1D, and the slightly older Pentax 645Z.
Theoretically, medium-format systems can allow for a higher standard of image quality than cameras with smaller sensors, but their practicalities (and cost) largely confine them to professional use.
DSLRs are typically easier to handle, for example, offer a much wider choice of native lenses, and can also autofocus much faster. If, however, we’re to base our expectations for the format on recent developments, we’ll no doubt see these sensors appearing in more affordable and compact bodies, along with improvements to performance and greater lens ranges.